|
In January 2002 a
lead scroll was found at Lees Ferry on the Colorado River in Arizona.
It purports to be written by John D. Lee.


|
Editor's
Note: This is the transcript of a letter written by Steve Mayfield to Scott
Gordon, President of FAIR. The letter is reproduced here with the permission
of both Steve and Scott.
Dear Scott,
Per our conversation
a few months ago, I am writing down a few items of information in reference
to the John D. Lee lead scroll, also known as the "Dead Lee Scroll"
(a title given to the scroll by author Will Bagley).
First, I want to correct
some misinformation that was made about the "scroll" a few months
ago on the FAIR message boards.
1. There is a rumor
that the police found, while searching Mark Hofmann's house, some lead
plates. Not so. What was found were copper plates. (This I was directly
told by some of the investigators involved in the search.)
2. We do know the name of the National Park Service worker who found the
lead scroll in Lee's Ferry Fort. His name is Allen Malmquist. He has lived
in the Page, Arizona, area for over forty years. He is a retired school
teacher and was a seasonal National Park worker while he taught. After
retirement, he became a full-time worker for the National Park Service,
as the "Lee's Ferry Interpreter." His contract has him working
24 out of 36 months. It was during one of his off periods (January 2002)
when he found the scroll in the fort. He was volunteering to clean out
the fort (although not paid, but covered by workmen's comp.). Allen was
our guide when George Throckmorton and I toured the area (Lee's Ferry,
Lonely Dell, and Signature Rock) in May 2003.
I believe Allen is one of the most knowledgeable people about this area,
since he is the person with the keys to get into the buildings in the
area. (Incidentally, Lee's Ferry Fort is locked up, and unless one breaks
in the door or pries the bars on the west side entry, you cannot get in!)
3. It was stated on the FAIR message board that testing was done on the
scroll to determine what caused the oxidation or why the scroll has a
red or brown color to it. NO TESTING HAS BEEN DONE ON THIS!! A young man
from Arizona State University (Tom Brunty, who is or was a graduate student
in religious studies), with assistance from people at Arizona State University
and Washington State University, determined that the lead was manufactured
in the 1850s from a plant in Arkansas or Southwest Missouri. Thus, it
is possible that the lead scroll is from the proper period of John D.
Lee. However, Brunty also suggested in his report that the lead for the
scroll could have been manufactured after 1850 when the plant was reopened
after years of closure.
George and I would
like to have the scroll tested as to the oxidation, and we have made contacts
with scientists at the University of Utah to do so. However, we never
received an answer form the National Park Service people in Page, Arizona,
as to whether or not we could obtain the scroll or samples from it for
testing. So, at present, that project is on hold. George Throckmorton
is planning on writing a report on his research on the "Dead Lee
Scroll" for a professional forensic journal in the next year.
To give you a quick
overview of why we believe the scroll to be fake, consider the following
points:
1. Spelling. John
D. Lee's spelling was poor, but not as poor as that on the scroll. In
fact, some of the words misspelled on the scroll were not words that John
misspelled in his writings.
2. Printing. John D. Lee's journals (that he started back in the 1840s)
has printing in the early years, but most of his writing was cursive,
especially in the 1870s when the scroll was allegedly written. When the
printing on the scroll is compared with the examples of his printing in
his journals, there are no similarities. This is very apparent in the
printing of his name.
3. Proper Names. On the scroll, the name HIGBEE is spelled HIGBY, the
name DAME is spelled DANE, and the scroll refers to the Mountain Meadows
Massacre as the FANCHER. In reviewing John D. Lee's journals (the Brooks
and Cleand edition) and also reviewing photocopies of his journal from
the Huntington Library, we found that before and after the date of the
scroll Lee spelled the names HIGBEE and DAME correctly and never refers
to the massacre as the FANCHER; he calls it what it was--the "Mountain
Meadows Massacre," MMM, or "the Massacre."
Also, the scroll refers to Brigham Young as "Pres Young" and
George A. Smith as "Geo Smith." In his journal we find that
he almost always referred to Brigham Young or in writing the name with
the letter B or Brig, or Brigham or Brother Brigham, and almost always
referred to George A. Smith with the letter A (such as George A. Smith
or Elder Geo. A. Smith or even GAS). Lee probably used the initials to
separate Brigham Young and George A. Smith from other Youngs or Smiths
of the time.
4. Tools. William Flynn of Phoenix, Arizona, who worked with George on
the Hofmann case, examined the scroll under a microscope and found that
the engraving on the scroll was done with a four- or five-sided nail that
was not available in the 1870s.
In July 2004 at a
book signing in Salt Lake City, I asked Will Bagley two questions, since
he knows and has reviewed all the writings of John D. Lee. First, I asked
him if there were in the John D. Lee collection any writings on metal
plates, and second if he was aware of anyone else in the American Southwest
during the last half of the 1800s who might have written on metal. Will
thought for a second and said "no," even though when the scroll
was found in 2002 he had told the media it was common practice in the
Old West to write on metal.
Now, as to whether
Mark Hofmann had anything to do with the scroll, I have a hundred-dollar
answer and a ten-cent answer. My ten-cent answer is that I don't really
know. The hundred-dollar answer is that there is no conclusive evidence
that would suggest or show that Hofmann had anything to do with manufacturing,
creating or distributing the scroll. However, there is some circumstantial
evidence that at present, I am not ready to eliminate Hofmann as the author
or maker of the scroll. The circumstantial evidence is as follows:
1. The scroll is
Mormon-related and controversial.
2. Hofmann dealt in metals in his forgeries (coins and items like the
printing plate for the Oath of a Freeman)
3. When Mark Hofmann was in prison (1988) he attempted suicide. While
at the hospital, a cell search was made at the prison, and officials found
a one-page paper with a list of "famous Americana" signatures
Hofmann had forged, and on the other side, a list of Mormon figures he
had forged. On that list is the name "John D. Lee." Those involved
in the investigation of the Hofmann case and those knowledgeable of Hofmann
forgeries know of no John D. Lee documents.
4. When the scroll was discovered in January 2001 and announced in March
2001, KSL/Deseret News asked Mark Hofmann (through Utah Corrections spokesman
Jack Ford) if he had anything to do with the scroll; a simple yes-or-no
question. Hofmann's answer (in typical Hofmann fashion) was "I have
nothing to say about this at this time."
A couple of additional
tidbits of information:
In 2000 the US Department
of Interior/National Park Service released a 400+ page study on the Lee's
Ferry and Lonely Dell Ranch area. This included a history of the areas
and sites as well as past and present photographs. One interesting piece
of information is that in 1976/1977, the logs on the roof of the fort
were taken down and refurbished (treated with epoxy) and the interior
walls strengthened. This eliminates the idea that the scroll was hidden
in the roof/logs and fell down due to an earthquake. Considering that
the fort has had a steady flow of inhabitants and usage, it makes it almost
impossible that the scroll was hidden or stored in the fort until discovered
in 2002. Also, a photo taken in July 1999 by the author of the above study
(Robert Graham) has a shot of the interior of the fort, looking east towards
the fireplace. In this photo one can see the lead scroll, as identified
by Allen Malmquist. Thus the scroll was in the fort at least by July 1999
before being found in January 2002.
So there you have
it. Hope this long essay or explanation is understandable. Anyone with
additional questions about the scroll or the topic of Hofmann can contact
me directly; I'm in the phone book.
-Steve Mayfield
|